M24 Chaffee
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:34 am
- Location: South Bend, In
M24 Chaffee
How many chaffees where in a platoon, company if they were put into tank groups by themselves.
-
- E5
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:12 am
Off the top of my head, the Chaffees replaced the M3/M5 series light tanks beginning in very late 1944. They were organized into light tank companies with 1 company per tank battalion similar to the M5s. The battalion had 3 companies of Shermans and 1 light tank company. The companies were standard 17 tank companies with 3 platoons of 5 and 2 tanks in the company HQ. I recall that there were also 1 or 2 'pure' light tank battalions that had 4 companies of 17 M24s in 1945, at least in the ETO. I read this in Osprey's US Tank and Tank Destoyer Battalions in the ETO 1944-1945.
Tactics are the opinion of the senior officer present.
-
- E5
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:59 am
- Location: BC, Canada
- Contact:
The 1945 formation of the Light Tank company was similar to earlier Light Tank companies except for the use of the Chaffee in place of the M5 Stuart.
http://154.20.242.180:8088/C/Schwere%20 ... 201945.doc
Troy
http://154.20.242.180:8088/C/Schwere%20 ... 201945.doc
Troy
-
- E5
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
One more comment to add ...
I believe that the US light tank units were not of "mixed" composition. In all the unit descriptions and photos that I've seen, there was never an instance of a light tank formation (company or battalion) that has both Stuarts and Chaffees.
For the sake of logistical and operational simplicity, light tank units equipped with one or the other. Most Chaffee-equipped units in ETO were new units from the states that had trained in Chaffees. Stuart-equipped units stayed with Stuarts and continued to receive replacement Stuarts as needed until they were wholly re-equipped with Chaffees, which was not too often done to my understanding, or until they stood down at war's end, which was more common.
I think the re-equipping with Chaffees process was more common in independant light tank formations than in the light tank companies within the medium tank battalions. But this is a vague impression I have, and I can't back it up with any explicit source citings.
Would be pleased to be confirmed or corrected on this by anyone who has useful source information.
I believe that the US light tank units were not of "mixed" composition. In all the unit descriptions and photos that I've seen, there was never an instance of a light tank formation (company or battalion) that has both Stuarts and Chaffees.
For the sake of logistical and operational simplicity, light tank units equipped with one or the other. Most Chaffee-equipped units in ETO were new units from the states that had trained in Chaffees. Stuart-equipped units stayed with Stuarts and continued to receive replacement Stuarts as needed until they were wholly re-equipped with Chaffees, which was not too often done to my understanding, or until they stood down at war's end, which was more common.
I think the re-equipping with Chaffees process was more common in independant light tank formations than in the light tank companies within the medium tank battalions. But this is a vague impression I have, and I can't back it up with any explicit source citings.
Would be pleased to be confirmed or corrected on this by anyone who has useful source information.
-Mark 1
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:22 am
- Location: Somewhere near the Chesapeake Bay
- Contact:
I know this thread is really about the Chaffee, but since the Stuart was mentioned I wonder if any of you other Olde Pharts out there (like me) remember this;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunted_Tank
Tanker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunted_Tank
Tanker
"An armored division is like a tuxedo. You don't need one often, but when you do nothing else will suffice." - quote heard at a meeting of the JCoS
-
- E5
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:59 am
- Location: BC, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:22 am
- Location: Somewhere near the Chesapeake Bay
- Contact:
Troy wrote:
Hey, maybe you could add a special rule for a haunted Stuart in your game system. Or an instance of a Tyranasaurus Rex or a straffing run by a Pteradactyl a la Weird War comics.
Tanker
Yeah, when I got older and began to know more about the various tanks I was always amazed at how powerful that little haunted Stuart was. No wonder the Nazis lost the war.Man did they smoke a lot of tigers in that Stuart!!
Hey, maybe you could add a special rule for a haunted Stuart in your game system. Or an instance of a Tyranasaurus Rex or a straffing run by a Pteradactyl a la Weird War comics.



Tanker
"An armored division is like a tuxedo. You don't need one often, but when you do nothing else will suffice." - quote heard at a meeting of the JCoS
-
- E5
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 2:22 am
- Location: Somewhere near the Chesapeake Bay
- Contact:
Mark,
Is that you commanding that Stuart? Sweeeet.
And just to put us back on Chaffees I've been looking for a picture of the main gate of Fort A.P Hill which has a Chaffee parked right off to one side overlooking the Rt. 301, Virginia. No luck though.
Tanker
Is that you commanding that Stuart? Sweeeet.
And just to put us back on Chaffees I've been looking for a picture of the main gate of Fort A.P Hill which has a Chaffee parked right off to one side overlooking the Rt. 301, Virginia. No luck though.
Tanker
"An armored division is like a tuxedo. You don't need one often, but when you do nothing else will suffice." - quote heard at a meeting of the JCoS
-
- E5
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Indeed it is. Well, not really commanding, but that's me in the TC's seat at least, as we drive down a suburban road near Louisville, Kentucky. Got a friend who restores tanks for fun and profit (well, more for fun and charity -- no real profit in it). He's driving, and in truth is the guy running the "mission" (it is his tank, after all).tanker talking:
Is that you commanding that Stuart? Sweeeet.
He went over to France with a team and two or three tanks last June, and drove from one end of Normandy to another, camping in fields as they went, as part of this year's D-Day commemorations. Seems he likes to play wargames at 1-to-1 model scale, not just unit scale...

-Mark 1
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD