The first place I went was to the Naval Historical Center (htttp://www.history.navy.mil/index.html). Follow the menu to "Online Resources, Online Photographic Collection, Ships of Foreign Navies and Government Agencies, Japanese Navy Ships. There you will find a several-paragraph description & history and several photographs of many Japanese WWII ships, including all four of the Kongo class. In particular, note the significant differences between their original appearance as WWI battlecruisers (with relatively little superstructure) and their final appearance (with massive tower bridge structures).
Don S.
2007-2008 New Release schedule
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am
- Location: Waukegan, Illinois USA
-
- E5
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:40 pm
- Location: Oklahoma
Re: Photos of Hiei
Thanks for the link. I thought they looked much alike after their reconstruction. I also thought the Kongos were the best looking Japanese battleships, and maybe they are, but some of the Kongos are ugly. Not in the same class of ugly with Fuso or Yamashiro of course, but ugly.Donald M. Scheef wrote:The first place I went was to the Naval Historical Center ( http://www.history.navy.mil/index.html ). Follow the menu to "Online Resources, Online Photographic Collection, Ships of Foreign Navies and Government Agencies, Japanese Navy Ships. There you will find a several-paragraph description & history and several photographs of many Japanese WWII ships, including all four of the Kongo class. In particular, note the significant differences between their original appearance as WWI battlecruisers (with relatively little superstructure) and their final appearance (with massive tower bridge structures).
Don S.
Ray