Using CD battles with GHQ WWII rules,
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
dougeagle
- E5
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:07 am
- Location: Northern Alberta
Using CD battles with GHQ WWII rules,
Just wondering if anyone has ever used some of the scenarios from Command Decision with GHQ's WWII rules? I've been pondering this idea for a few days now and thought I would check to see if anyone else has.
Doug
A goal is not always meant to be reached, it often serves simply as something to aim at.
Bruce Lee
A goal is not always meant to be reached, it often serves simply as something to aim at.
Bruce Lee
-
RedLeif
- E5
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:11 am
- Location: Boise, ID
- Contact:
I looked into CD v.2 years ago and I bought the TO&E book from GDW about that time. These older rules tended to group the soldiers of a battalion a little differently than MATG. For example a soviet tank battalion which historically fought with 2 companies of 10 tanks subdivided into 3 platoons of 3 tanks ea., plus 1 Co. HQ tank would be represented in CD as 4 tank stands and don't quote me on this as I don't have the book in front of me it also had 1 HQ stand, while in MATG those two companies would have 6 stands plus 1 for the battalion command. So CD has slightly different TO&E's than MATG. But I'd bet the scenarios would work pretty well. I'd also be interested in reading others experiences with more modern editions of CD.
redLeif
redLeif