Project: terrain model and GHQ miniatures for Army training

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

Gentlemen, after an extended hiatus I have an update. The project went on hold for a while as I was engaged in a tactical combatives course that sucked the energy out of me for a good while. Over the Christmas season break, however, I was able to resume work and my new class of students (11 US Army captains of mostly infantry and armor, as well as one US Marine officer, and two foreign students) are my test subjects.

One note: I reduced the overly large size of the old images to something that shouldn't mess with anyone's browser size.

I completed one terrain model representing three square KM of actual terrain (the model is about seven square feet.) The initial goal of a four square KM model would have significantly increased the monetary and time costs of the project, and were not needed to achieve my training objectives.

I also completed the required opposing forces for this lesson, and based them on tokens showing doctrinal unit symbols to assist the students in learning military symbology.

Overall, it was a very fun project though very time consuming. I found an overhead projector greatly sped up terrain tile production; I projected the grid squares onto the foam, traced the terrain lines, and then just cut. This was much faster than free-handing them. Due to the fairly large cost of foam boards, spray paint, and dry-wall patching spackle, I will probably make the subsequent terrain models two dimensional, perhaps using a tarp or something similar.

Painting continues on additional units for future lessons. I've got a company of M2A3 Bradleys to replace the original M1s of the original production, I've crudely scratch built a mine roller for a tank, and I have probably about 100 miniatures left to paint in the weeks ahead including several companies worth of Russian forces; more to follow.

The below pictures illustrate some of my production records, a few pictures from my class with the students using the terrain model and Microarmor miniatures, and some closeups of the result of the student's classwork.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Adding detail: roads and water.
Image

The monotionous task of adding trees complete, the model is testfit in my driveway.
Image

In the classroom. The prototype tile remains a bit warped, but isn't used in training. Basing only on foam posterboard proved OK, though in the future I think drywall spackle might not be the way to go. Still, it was better than using plaster of paris.
Image

Image

The student's foe: a reinforced light infantry platoon, the nearby company HQ, and the counterattack of a BMP-2 platoon and a sortie of HIND-Ds. The BMPs and the HIND are not based on their symbol token, all other Microarmor pieces are.
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Yesterday, my students discuss and ** CENSORED ** their enemy in class...
Image

...and array forces.
Image

And here are some pictures of the Microarmor products as emplaced by the students.

Image

Image

Image

The counterattack
Image

Image

Thanks for all the input into the boards everyone: this was my first foray into Micro-armor, and my first terrain model ever. If not for this great archive here, it would not have turned out as well as it did. Also, thanks to GHQ for creating an excellent product that is very conducive to military training.

Cheers!
-busboy

chrisswim
E5
Posts: 7269
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post by chrisswim »

Busboy,
Great stuff, every excellant info and contributions.
FOGS
As for the Hemtts: "M977 HEMTTs model and a Dremel tool to turn the bed into a flat rack. If it was a PLS, we also added the third rear axle from another HEMTT (3 M977s make 2 M1075s). We then used the top of an M88 crane as the "A" frame on the flat rack. It's time consuming, and I'd love to see a PLS/LHS model from GHQ."

It used to take 3 Hemtt M977s to make 2 5-axle Hemtts. I have now made it 5 M977 to make 4 of the 5-axle Hemtts. Although a wheel or two is not set 100% right. I have not made any of the PLS/LHS Hemtts yet. Do you have any pics of those and the other conversions?

In the pack for the M777, I would prefer the 5-ton FMTV truck with the lift station that is on the back of the Hemtts, even just one or two for the arty units.
Chris

philly'sBestRussianArmor
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:22 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Post by philly'sBestRussianArmor »

looks like some good times

the map is interesting, but the symbolic trees are rather off-putting.
I strove for more trees than you did, using 3000 qtips for a five by four foot board

still, I'd love to play on your wargame board too
modern miniature armored wargames rules, as detailed but streamlined as possible, include Wargames Research Group's rules and also Challenger

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

philly'sBestRussianArmor wrote:looks like some good times

the map is interesting, but the symbolic trees are rather off-putting.
I strove for more trees than you did, using 3000 qtips for a five by four foot board

still, I'd love to play on your wargame board too
The trees are merely meant to represent the graphical representation of a military map. The 3 square KM replicated here is actual terrain that the students actually walk as part of their training. As much as I'd artistically love to show dense woodlines, I kept it sparse to allow placement of icons, etc. This terrain model is for military training rather than table top gaming. The students already are supposed to have a detailed understanding of the terrain prior to arraying forces, and understand the "sparse trees" represent a fairly sizable, though not exceedingly dense woodline.

Now, I gotta say, I LOVE your idea of using q-tips for trees. I mean...that is brilliant. If I ever make a terrain model for my own enjoyment, I'll do that in a heartbeat. Tearing up railroad foliage wasn't exactly a picnic on this. Thanks for the tip! No pun intended.
-busboy

whoa Mohamed
E5
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Central TX

Post by whoa Mohamed »

you did a super job I would game on that in a heartbeat....Mikey
every man for all mens rights
all men for every mans rights

BattlerBritain
E5
Posts: 628
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Somerset, UK

Post by BattlerBritain »

Superb stuff :)

Love the terrain and it's really great to see a practical application of 'our toys' in use.

The colours you've used for the terrain also look really good - well done.

Figures are well painted and give an accurate representation of real world units.

The trees you've done convey a good visual impression. Other ways I've come across that also give a good impression of a big belt of forest are to use lots of pins (or matches) to represent multiple tree trunks but then to just sit pieces of irregular painted foam on top of them. It gives a canopy approach and allows the hiding of units underneath the trees.

Your stuff looks great though.

I also notice the uniform and shoulder patches of the soldier squatting with his back to the camera. Is he part of the 'multi-national' force :wink: ?

whoa Mohamed
E5
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:33 pm
Location: Central TX

Post by whoa Mohamed »

In toatal I see a Marine ,Army and what apears to be a Jordanian,French or IDF tanker in CVC Coveralls.....Mikey
every man for all mens rights
all men for every mans rights

6mmwargaming
E5
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:30 am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by 6mmwargaming »

Wow great looking table.

Another option tree is have removeable ones and use pins to stick them in. I did that with my terrain boards and its great as you can put them anywhere like the side of hills, which you can't do with based trees. eg

Image

Image

Cheers
Kieran

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

I appreciate the feedback all. If I ever do this again for non-work related projects I'll definitely take your advise into account. This current tree solution was definately the "good enough for government work" system. :)
-busboy

WHM
E5
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Central N.J.

Post by WHM »

Anyone else not seeing busboy's pictures?

WHM
E5
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:42 pm
Location: Central N.J.

Post by WHM »

Now I see some, but lost some, maybe it's me.

Just how effective is training w/miniatures? I remember Armor Magazine had an article how a unit used them.

I like your idea about choice of material. Thought about doing the same thing but time, heavy investment in Terrain Maker, plus no one to play with kind of worked against me. With all the woods did the players become road bound?

piersyf
E5
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by piersyf »

How effective? Like any tool, it depends on how it is used. I had the opportunity to run a game for an artillery unit (not mine) that involved the training officer for a battery (an LT), the battery FO (a captain) and myself as umpire. The FO had played before, so knew what happened; the training officer had never played a wargame before, of any kind.

It was set in WW2. The training officer was using US forces (so he was familiar with the 105's capabilities). He asked what the rules were, how they worked, what he could do. I told him just to tell me what he would really do and I would tell him how that translated into the game. The main thing to remember was what he expected to be possible in 1 minute (a turn).

At the end of the game, I asked him what he thought, and he replied that the results had been exactly what he would have expected in real life. That, to me, was confirmation that the rules I had developed were 'on track' (although to be fair, I am ex artillery, so if I can't get that right, I should give up now...)

It is a cost effective training aid so long as it replicates what you expect from other training methodologies.
There is no right or wrong, only decisions and consequences.

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

My students have provided positive feedback so far, however not every student learns the same way. Some undoubtedly got more out of it than others, but generally speaking it was value added. The terrain model hasn't been used to "wargame" in our doctrinal sense (I do this, so the enemy does this, so I do this back) but rather to discuss how the OPFOR would array his forces to accomplish his mission on the given terrain. We are only right now working on the friendly plan.

I do refer to the terrain model at least hourly as opposed to the map, though, so it is seeing other use. I'll also have the opportunity to use the terrain model during after action reviews.

More to follow.

If images are refusing to load let me know. I can probably post an imageshack link.
-busboy

GHQ
Site Admin
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:50 am
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA

Post by GHQ »

Great job Busboy! It really looks nice! We have been selling our miniatures to the US military for use as training aids since the early 1970's. In fact, a project for the US Army was what initiated our Modern line. At this point we have sent miniatures out for use as training aids to military units from countries all across the world.

Thank you for making GHQ miniatures a part of your project, and for sharing your photos with everyone!

GHQ

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

After a big batch of work, the next batch of GHQ minis are ready for training.

Some pictures here. I made a rather crude mine roller out of spare parts and sprues, made another M1A2 platoon with the spares, replaced the M2s with M2A3s, completed my required engineer package, and completed the mech OPFOR package (three BMP2 companies, a T72 company, a T80 company, and some misc stuff some of which I need and some of which just came with the combat commands. I'm using MTLBs for OPFOR engineer vehicles. I also made a platoon of M60A3s for fun.

Only the Stryker company remains now. I'll probably take next weekend off.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
-busboy

Post Reply