Things id like to see in 2016
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 2195
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 5:45 am
Things I'd Like to See in 2016
Hey Kampfgruppe
You have some of the same WWII requests that I would like to see as well.
I would also like GHQ to add a second WWII British Heavy Weapons Pack to their range.
The current pack does not have any PIAT's, Vickers MMG's, 3 inch mortars, or even a correct 2 inch mortar. I would love GHQ to add this to their line.
In addition, I would also ask for a second American Heavy Weapons pack as well. This one would have both the M1917 water cooled .30 cal and the M1919 air cooled .30 cal. I would also like to see some 81 mm mortars as well. All of these would have at least 2 man crews. The Marines now have an M1919 so why not the Army.
I also think a Ferdinand and a mid production Tiger I would be great as well. There are several other items on your list that I would definitely buy as well.
Pete
You have some of the same WWII requests that I would like to see as well.
I would also like GHQ to add a second WWII British Heavy Weapons Pack to their range.
The current pack does not have any PIAT's, Vickers MMG's, 3 inch mortars, or even a correct 2 inch mortar. I would love GHQ to add this to their line.
In addition, I would also ask for a second American Heavy Weapons pack as well. This one would have both the M1917 water cooled .30 cal and the M1919 air cooled .30 cal. I would also like to see some 81 mm mortars as well. All of these would have at least 2 man crews. The Marines now have an M1919 so why not the Army.
I also think a Ferdinand and a mid production Tiger I would be great as well. There are several other items on your list that I would definitely buy as well.
Pete
-
- E5
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:11 am
- Location: Boise, ID
- Contact:
I think it would be cool to see the following Rocket Artillery models:
FWP - FROG-7 - used by Soviet era to contemporary forces.
US - Honest John- out of use now but still an interesting cold war weapon.
A Hawk AA missile system would be slick too.
Edit 3/27/15:
I'd also like to see a 9p149 tracked ATGM vehicle (this is an MT-LB w/9m114(AT-6) or more recently the 9M120(AT-9). I know many probably just modify a MT-LB (GHQ # W31), but I'd like GHQ to cast this if possible. The upper deck panels are different than the APC variants and I'd like a casting of the missile tube in launch position if possible.
The MT-LBM (any of the modernized 'apc' varirants would be welcome e.g. the 6MA, 6MA1, 6MA2 or 6MA4, - modernized MTLB w/ various BTR80 turrets or 6MB, 6MB3 or 6MB4 - modernized MTLB w/ various MTR80a turrets). see this image of the MT-LBM 6MB system - http://77rus.smugmug.com/Military/Engin ... eTe2-L.jpg
Also the MTLBM (6MB5) AA variant (turret w/ dual ZU-23 or 30mm AC's & dual 9K38 Igla (SA-16.18 or 24) SAM's on top would be nice too.
A BTR-90 would be a nice update to the BTR line.
Thanks for reading GHQ!
FWP - FROG-7 - used by Soviet era to contemporary forces.
US - Honest John- out of use now but still an interesting cold war weapon.
A Hawk AA missile system would be slick too.
Edit 3/27/15:
I'd also like to see a 9p149 tracked ATGM vehicle (this is an MT-LB w/9m114(AT-6) or more recently the 9M120(AT-9). I know many probably just modify a MT-LB (GHQ # W31), but I'd like GHQ to cast this if possible. The upper deck panels are different than the APC variants and I'd like a casting of the missile tube in launch position if possible.
The MT-LBM (any of the modernized 'apc' varirants would be welcome e.g. the 6MA, 6MA1, 6MA2 or 6MA4, - modernized MTLB w/ various BTR80 turrets or 6MB, 6MB3 or 6MB4 - modernized MTLB w/ various MTR80a turrets). see this image of the MT-LBM 6MB system - http://77rus.smugmug.com/Military/Engin ... eTe2-L.jpg
Also the MTLBM (6MB5) AA variant (turret w/ dual ZU-23 or 30mm AC's & dual 9K38 Igla (SA-16.18 or 24) SAM's on top would be nice too.
A BTR-90 would be a nice update to the BTR line.
Thanks for reading GHQ!
Last edited by RedLeif on Sat Mar 28, 2015 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- E5
- Posts: 7289
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:22 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
I would really like a
PATRIA AMV with different turret options. Such as for Poland, Slovika, SADF, etc.
CV9030 and the CV90 AA vehicle.
AN idea, instead of re-work the Hind-D, develop a Hind-F or other Hind model or Havoc.
Some of those other ideas are great such as VAB Medical or other options that are deployed. VLRA ACMA, Peugeot P4 is great (I use Russian UAZ 469 as my surrogate.
The ERC-90 is made by someone already, so let us not duplicate that item.
PATRIA AMV with different turret options. Such as for Poland, Slovika, SADF, etc.
CV9030 and the CV90 AA vehicle.
AN idea, instead of re-work the Hind-D, develop a Hind-F or other Hind model or Havoc.
Some of those other ideas are great such as VAB Medical or other options that are deployed. VLRA ACMA, Peugeot P4 is great (I use Russian UAZ 469 as my surrogate.
The ERC-90 is made by someone already, so let us not duplicate that item.
Chris
-
- E5
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:55 am
- Location: France
yes very nice ideainstead of re-work the Hind-D, develop a Hind-F or other Hind model or Havoc.

ButiI'm not agree about the erc90 of the other company it is not the correct model at all, the "other" is based on a prototype and there is big differences on the hull with the production model.

compare the red circle to the "other"

-
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: Leicester, UK
I would really like to see a pack of German Kubelwagen (8 per pack as Schwimmwagen). At the moment we only have G40 with 4 Kubelwagens per pack.
Also I would like to see the Horch Kfz 69 which was the standard light truck for most of the war and used for troop transport and bigger than the Steyr-daimler cars in G79. Also separate packs for Panther D and Panther A instead of the mixed pack - G81. Also, any chance of WW2 French artillery crews? I cannot get them anywhere.
Thanks.
Also I would like to see the Horch Kfz 69 which was the standard light truck for most of the war and used for troop transport and bigger than the Steyr-daimler cars in G79. Also separate packs for Panther D and Panther A instead of the mixed pack - G81. Also, any chance of WW2 French artillery crews? I cannot get them anywhere.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 6:38 am
How's this in 1:1200?
How's this in 1:1200?
Confederate:
CSS Albemarle, twin-screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Arkansas, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Atlanta, triple-screw steamer, ironclad,
CSS Charleston, steamer, ironclad
CSS Chicora, steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Fredericksburg, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Georgia, ironclad steam battery
CSS Manassas, screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Missouri, steam sloop, ironclad
CSS Muscogee, twin-screw with center-wheel steamer, ironclad
CSS Nashville, side-wheel steamer, ironclad
CSS Neuse, twin-screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Palmetto State, sloop, ironclad
CSS Raleigh, sloop, ironclad
CSS Richmond, screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Savannah, steam sloop ironclad
CSS Tennessee, ironclad ram
CSS Texas, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram, never completed
CSS Tuscaloosa, ironclad steam battery
CSS Virginia, screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Virginia II, ironclad
Confederate:
CSS Albemarle, twin-screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Arkansas, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Atlanta, triple-screw steamer, ironclad,
CSS Charleston, steamer, ironclad
CSS Chicora, steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Fredericksburg, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Georgia, ironclad steam battery
CSS Manassas, screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Missouri, steam sloop, ironclad
CSS Muscogee, twin-screw with center-wheel steamer, ironclad
CSS Nashville, side-wheel steamer, ironclad
CSS Neuse, twin-screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Palmetto State, sloop, ironclad
CSS Raleigh, sloop, ironclad
CSS Richmond, screw steamer, ironclad
CSS Savannah, steam sloop ironclad
CSS Tennessee, ironclad ram
CSS Texas, twin-screw steamer, ironclad ram, never completed
CSS Tuscaloosa, ironclad steam battery
CSS Virginia, screw steamer, ironclad ram
CSS Virginia II, ironclad
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:34 am
- Location: Southeastern North Carolina
-
- E5
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:42 am
- Location: Houston, we have a problem...
While the idea of a Civil War Ironclad line sounds good - there's already a lot of competition out there. Just the Rod Langton line alone covers a lot of the ships on both sides quite well.
I'm not sure GHQ would want to risk it there...
I'm not sure GHQ would want to risk it there...
"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of java that the thoughts acquire speed. The hands acquire the shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion." - Programmer's Mantra
-
- E5
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:11 am
- Location: Boise, ID
- Contact:
The new Russian T-14 MBT:
https://military.id.me/trending-militar ... nk-in-may/
I know it isn't even produced yet but
Want!

https://military.id.me/trending-militar ... nk-in-may/
I know it isn't even produced yet but
Want!
