Atticus wrote:hmm very cool. looks like i have some experimenting to do. the trouble i'm having mostly is with applying the detail(camo patterns and webbing...etc) and also i'd like to have some contrast between the troops' uniform and gear/webbing, but using woodland colors.
Well, I probably shouldn't say too much more, as others here seem to do far better and more detailed infantry than I. But I've never let my lack of capability hold me back before, so what the heck ...
If it is the actual skill of getting all the fiddly details painted up that is your concern, you might want to try the experimenting with your dry-brushing techniques to do the hard work for you.
I would suggest getting your base color in place, and then whatever squiggles you might want to effect some sort of camo. Then go directly to dry-brushing. Use a notably lighter rendition of your base uniform color, maybe something even a little towards browner, or greener, than the base color. Hit the figures with the dry-brush, and you will wind up highlighting all the webbing and web gear (packs and canteens, etc.). Do this BEFORE you detail the guns, boots, faces-and-hands, and helmets of your figures. That way you won't wind up with guns and helmet-edges colored like the web gear. Then finish with a dark wash ... maybe more dark brown than black, to bring out some of the detail (including further enhancement of the web gear's edges).
This is the sequence that IanH has described on his website for painting infantry. Putting the dry-brushing up front, and using it as a means of painting the details of the webbing, has helped me improve the results of my own infantry painting noticeably.
With this approach, you still paint up the details of the boots, guns, faces-and-hands, and helmets, but you don't paint up all of the webgear. Yet the webgear winds up looking distinct from the base uniforms. Kind of a cheap-skates detailing of the figures.

Here are some of my WW2 Italians. Again, I ain't the best infantry-painter around (although now I might have a chance since I can actually SEE the figures with with my new tri-focal glasses). And my photography skills also don't quite do justice to the figures. But I followed the sequence described above with these figures, and I am quite pleased with the way they came out. Not exactly Ritter- or Cama-grade, but better than what I'd done before.
Give it a try. See how it plays. Take some pics and post 'em up here. I'm sure you'll find someone kind enough to point out how you can do better next time!
