Naval Fire Support

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

Post Reply
Maple-leaf-Warrior
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:33 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Naval Fire Support

Post by Maple-leaf-Warrior »

Would I be right to assume that Naval fire support (ex. 6 inch guns) would be treated as off table artillery?

much thanks,

Russ :D
"...But now, seeing that the spirits of death stand close about us in their thousands, no man can turn aside or escape them, let us go on and win glory for ourselves, or yield it to others."

The Iliad

piersyf
E5
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by piersyf »

Which rule set? Kinda depends. You can, of course, treat a cruiser as a battery of medium guns, except that some had 12 6" guns (equal to a full battalion) and the loading system meant that a much higher sustained rate of fire was possible. Almost no land combat rules treat naval gunfire or air dropped ordnance accurately.

battlewagon
E5
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:57 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by battlewagon »

I'd take a look at Micronauts - The Game (or whatever naval rules you are familiar with) to establish the range and rate of fire for the types of ships in your naval gunfire support group and look at the combat tables for modifiers for a stationary target. You could create additional modifiers for direct fire vs having a spotter plane or forward observer calling in the coordinates.

Interesting fact: on January 10th, 1945 the USS Pennsylvania used her 14" guns to take out a Japanese tank column in the Phillippines. 12 - 14" projectiles = no more tank column.

I hope this helps.
Always respect the law of gross tonnage (aka "bigger boat wins")

jb
E5
Posts: 2160
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Antananarivo

Re: Naval Fire Support

Post by jb »

Maple-leaf-Warrior wrote:Would I be right to assume that Naval fire support (ex. 6 inch guns) would be treated as off table artillery?

much thanks,

Russ :D
Extremely vague question with tons of answers...but I guess the bottom line answer would be "yes" if the ship(s) in question are not physically on the gaming area...
John

av8rmongo
E5
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Newport, RI
Contact:

Re: Naval Fire Support

Post by av8rmongo »

jb wrote:
Maple-leaf-Warrior wrote:Would I be right to assume that Naval fire support (ex. 6 inch guns) would be treated as off table artillery?

much thanks,

Russ :D
Extremely vague question with tons of answers...but I guess the bottom line answer would be "yes" if the ship(s) in question are not physically on the gaming area...
Unless something went terribly wrong they should be off table. If not, well, as Ricky would have said, "Lucy you've got some 'splaining to do".
“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.â€￾
― George Orwell, 1984

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
- George Orwell

http://av8rmongo.wordpress.com

battlewagon
E5
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:57 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Naval Fire Support

Post by battlewagon »

av8rmongo wrote:
jb wrote:
Maple-leaf-Warrior wrote:Would I be right to assume that Naval fire support (ex. 6 inch guns) would be treated as off table artillery?

much thanks,

Russ :D
Extremely vague question with tons of answers...but I guess the bottom line answer would be "yes" if the ship(s) in question are not physically on the gaming area...
Unless something went terribly wrong they should be off table. If not, well, as Ricky would have said, "Lucy you've got some 'splaining to do".
What?...Nobody makes a set of treads for a 600' cruiser???
(No...I'm not going to do it)
Always respect the law of gross tonnage (aka "bigger boat wins")

piersyf
E5
Posts: 625
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Post by piersyf »

Yeah, ships in close are an issue, but destroyers can and did operate 1000yds offshore. I have had models on board for beach landings. The issue we always had was not the naval gunfire (treated as medium artillery for US destroyers, field artillery or medium for British destroyers) but direct fire from shore to ship. A mortar stonk will hurt a DD if you can get the range (I know, not direct fire). Much simpler to keep them at a distance from the shore.

If you run aground, yeah you have some 'splainin'' to do. Something of an issue for early LST skippers, being told to 'deliberately' run aground.

jb
E5
Posts: 2160
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Antananarivo

Post by jb »

Just an example of what to expect when adding Naval gunfire support to your games. the following website address' how far the US Navy has achieved in this category up to the point in WWII at Iwo Jima...
http://www.allworldwars.com/Iwo-Jima-Na ... pport.html
John

Post Reply