Modern Brits
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Modern Brits
Read an article today that reported the Brits intended to reduce their Challenger II numbers from 227 to 148. That indicates enough for two regiments of 56 each (three squadrons of 18 each plus two regimental headquarters tanks, assuming they retain that structure). I don't know what they are doing with the remainder. That gives Great Britain TWO armoured brigades (two mech bns, one armoured regt each). I guess they have to pay for those carriers somehow. It may be they intend to reorganize to emphasize the Royal Navy to reinforce pressure on China. Speculation at the moment, on my part.
Well, I assumed a 56-tank regiment. If they use a 44-tank regiment, they could man 3 regiments and have 3 armoured brigades (2 mech, 1 tank each).
Well, I assumed a 56-tank regiment. If they use a 44-tank regiment, they could man 3 regiments and have 3 armoured brigades (2 mech, 1 tank each).
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2015 7:27 pm
- Location: Coppel, TX
Re: Modern Brits
Yeah, I've been following their drawdown too for a while now. There's been so much contradictory talk too. They talked about getting rid of all of their tanks but government balked. Those maintenance contracts bring a lot of money to certain chairs. I thought they were just going to put the extras in storage vs scrapping. As I understand, they wanted to reduce costs to afford more aircraft, in addition to the ones for the carriers. Although they have too few escorts as it is, since they're set to retire more than they're contracting to build.
Quite a few countries seem to be downsizing armies. It's weird gamers and collectors here have significantly larger forces than major nations. My modern Soviet navy is almost larger than Russia's current navy.
Quite a few countries seem to be downsizing armies. It's weird gamers and collectors here have significantly larger forces than major nations. My modern Soviet navy is almost larger than Russia's current navy.
-
- E5
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: UK
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Re: Modern Brits
Thanks for the article. We have forgotten about the "come as you are war" that AirLand Battle used to talk about. War is hellishly more expensive these days, but losing is worse.
I regret to see those proud old British regiments mothballed or amalgamated. But I hated to see a number of US units deactivated, as well, especially thise in which I served.
Yeah, I have a 56-tank regiment, which gives me 1/3 of the real British tank establishment. Planning to add Boxer bn to the Warrior bn I have.
I regret to see those proud old British regiments mothballed or amalgamated. But I hated to see a number of US units deactivated, as well, especially thise in which I served.
Yeah, I have a 56-tank regiment, which gives me 1/3 of the real British tank establishment. Planning to add Boxer bn to the Warrior bn I have.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Re: Modern Brits
Thanks for the article. We have forgotten about the "come as you are war" that AirLand Battle used to talk about. War is hellishly more expensive these days, but losing is worse.
I regret to see those proud old British regiments mothballed or amalgamated. But I hated to see a number of US units deactivated, as well, especially thise in which I served.
Yeah, I have a 56-tank regiment, which gives me 1/3 of the real British tank establishment. Planning to add Boxer bn to the Warrior bn I have.
I regret to see those proud old British regiments mothballed or amalgamated. But I hated to see a number of US units deactivated, as well, especially thise in which I served.
Yeah, I have a 56-tank regiment, which gives me 1/3 of the real British tank establishment. Planning to add Boxer bn to the Warrior bn I have.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: UK
Re: Modern Brits
A lot of those regiments are understrength and the actual real loss in personnel (rather than posts) is only about 4,000. There's also a commitment to initiate the Astute class replacement, up to 8 new support vessels, a new class of destroyer, more F-35s, the Type 32s, improved cyber and space warfare etc. On balance it's a good review.
CG2
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Re: Modern Brits
What vehicle do the Brits use as ammunition support for AS-90? Still use M548, FAASV, or some other?
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:02 am
- Location: Riverside, CA
Re: Modern Brits
Good question PG! I'll see if there is anything in my Fort Sill references if no one else knows.
We need some pics of modern British micro armor!
We need some pics of modern British micro armor!
Redleg's Website: micropope.webstarts.com
-
- E5
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: UK
Re: Modern Brits
Just standard trucks as far as I know. Normally pallet-loaded on MAN 10 tonners. The M548s went a long time ago and we never had FAASVs.
CG2
-
- E5
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:22 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: Modern Brits
As I understand, the Brits have a truck that they utilize a crane on that carries ammo.
Chris
-
- E5
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: UK
Re: Modern Brits
Yes - that's the MAN 10 tonner. If you look at the British Army website you can see it under Logistics Vehicles.
CG2
-
- E5
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:02 am
- Location: Riverside, CA
Re: Modern Brits
That's good info on the British artillery! Now, apparently, I need to build a British AS9 battery!
Redleg's Website: micropope.webstarts.com
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Re: Modern Brits
Me, too.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 11:38 am
- Location: UK
Re: Modern Brits
As a matter of interest, what are you guys using for modern artillery crew? Do you use WW2 crew figures, suitable poses from modern packs or another manufacturer?
CG2
-
- E5
- Posts: 3342
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Re: Modern Brits
I don't use crews or people. I just collect vehicles.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.