Joint Task Force Pope

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

panzergator
E5
Posts: 3347
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by panzergator »

I believe I know how my 3D-printing son is going to spend a few weekends with his dad... We are going to have a miniature Ray Barracks in my basement! Been to Conn - took the M1 driver's thermal viewer there for testing in '81 and wife was stationed at Wurzburg '93-'97. Went up to Schweinfurt for my tank fix a few times.
Last edited by panzergator on Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.

MechCommander
E5
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:09 am

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by MechCommander »

Speaking of 3D printing. feast your eyes on this!!! A YB-49 bomber

Image

whenimaginationfails
E5
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:00 pm
Location: Massachusetts, United States
Contact:

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by whenimaginationfails »

redleg wrote:
Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:29 am

Next I made a basswood square that just barely fit inside the building. This would provide the layered effect I wanted and it would provide stability.
That is a very cool approach. It would be a solid building.

I glue thin plastic sheets to the inside of the walls with a glue stick and then glue plastic L corner pieces to hold the corners together. Holds up well and is lightweight.

redleg
E5
Posts: 3453
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: Riverside, CA

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by redleg »

Whenimaginationfails, that sounds like a good technique! I think I might give that a shot on some future buildings. I'm still experimenting quite a bit, and I knw I want to have hangars and maintenance bays open, so that might be a great way to stabilize the building and keep the internal space open!

PG, you gotta share your Ray Barracks project! I don't know that caserne, but I spent a lot of time at Conn Barracks (usually when the brigade commander wanted to chew our butt for something) Spent a ton of time in Wuerzburg - beautiful city! I would move there in a second if I had an opportunity.

Nice bomber, Mech!
Redleg's Website: micropope.webstarts.com

panzergator
E5
Posts: 3347
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by panzergator »

Did you know Ted Barnes at Conn?

Ray Barracks (where Elvis served) was in Friedberg, near Frankfurt 3AD. I also spent some time in Baumholder. Wife dragged me to Wurzburg. All were privileged assignments. Also enjoyed those periodic excursions to Grafenwohr, Hohenfels, and Wildflecken.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.

MechCommander
E5
Posts: 3383
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2017 1:09 am

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by MechCommander »

redleg wrote:
Wed Apr 24, 2024 10:14 pm
Whenimaginationfails, that sounds like a good technique! I think I might give that a shot on some future buildings. I'm still experimenting quite a bit, and I knw I want to have hangars and maintenance bays open, so that might be a great way to stabilize the building and keep the internal space open!

PG, you gotta share your Ray Barracks project! I don't know that caserne, but I spent a lot of time at Conn Barracks (usually when the brigade commander wanted to chew our butt for something) Spent a ton of time in Wuerzburg - beautiful city! I would move there in a second if I had an opportunity.

Nice bomber, Mech!

Thanks took me 3 and a half hours to print this bomber on my Ender 3 pro.

redleg
E5
Posts: 3453
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: Riverside, CA

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by redleg »

I just finished a couple mech companies for my DD-214 project. This is A and B Companies / 1-18 Infantry "Vanguard". I feel like I ALWAYS need more Bradleys! And I still have another mech battalion to build once 1-18 IN is done!

Image

Image

Just basic M2 Brads for both companies, except for the B Company Commander's track. When we deployed to Iraq in February 2004, B Company was commanded by CPT Hans Kurth. Hans was a great dude. He was killed on March 13, 2004 in Tikrit, so to honor him B66 will always fly an American flag.

Image

Image
Redleg's Website: micropope.webstarts.com

chrisswim
E5
Posts: 6632
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:22 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by chrisswim »

Ohhhhh Mike, that is so cool! The American Flag in the breeze on the M-2!
Those two companies look great.
Is that an Orange panel for air recognition?
Chris

foxbat
E5
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:01 am
Location: France

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by foxbat »

Beautiful minis, redleg. Great rendition oif the NATO camo scheme. And a great tribute to your departed friend.

panzergator
E5
Posts: 3347
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am

Re: Joint Task Force Pope

Post by panzergator »

Great stuff, Hoth. A nice tribute.

You are correct, though - you always need more Bradleys. An armored or mech unit NEVER has ENOUGH infantry! Armored infantry battalions in armored divisions during WWII were ALWAYS short of infantry. And these days, because of limited capacity in Bradley, mech platoons start off smaller. The M113 was designed for the 11-man infantry squad. So pack on the Bradleys. Or add two AMPVs to each platoon to carry more guys to beef it up.

I've considered adding two M2s to each platoon, adding two AMPVs, or just adding a 4th platoon to each company. As inclined as I have been to run tank-heavy teams and task forces, the fact is, you simply need more infantry available for most tasks. And given what is going on in Ukraine, we should emphasize infantry even more. We have to be careful of providing the enemy in neat little packages of infantry soldiers to be easily destroyed by the dozen by inexpensive drones. Hope the planning guys are paying attention, because the solutions of 10 and 20 years ago no longer apply.

Think about how you will add drone defense to formations and vehicles - not just single drones but swarms. It may be lasers with computer-driven (dare I say "AI") targeting.

My collecting largely emphasizes extant TOEs - D, E, H, J. BUT! I'm looking at my own ideas for MTOE, also. The money just keeps getting soaked up by work on artillery support, Brit, German, and French units of the NATO brigade, as well as interesting support vehicles, like the CRAARV, wreckers, bridges, engineers, and TRUCKS. MY GOD, THE NUMBER OF TRUCKS! I'm really gonna hafta learn 3D printing... I need to work out the goals and set priorities. So, I'm currently fleshing out the Brits. One more Challenger 2 squadron, maneuver support company for armoured infantry battalion, 2 more batteries for the Arty regiment, and then on to a mechanized battalion in Boxers. 3D printing would make it a lot cheaper if I'm doing the printing. I really need Chris Stockton's budget for this, although, with two daughters getting married this summer, his budget for minis has likely taken a slight hit!

Some of the things I am considering - US units equipped with Boxer, Eitan, Merkava IV, adding an airborne battalion represented by the infantry company in formation. I just got the Israeli stuff from Chris. One 14-tank Merkava IV company, one Namer company, and one Eitan company. Need one more Eitan company, organized as US.

DOES ANYBODY KNOW HOW TO TURN OFF THE DAMNED "AUTO-CORRECT" in this forum? It corrects things to things to INcorrect!
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.

Post Reply