We have just posted our April 2011 new releases. They are:
AC-79 P40C Tomahawk
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/ac79.html
G-559 Jagdpanzer E-50
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/g559.html
N-540 AMX-VCI
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/n540.html
W-87 BMP-T
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/w87.html
IS-13 Namer
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/is13.html
UKN-47 MV Tower Hill
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/ukn47.html
IJN-50 CV Shinano
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/ijn50.html
ACW-66 Advancing Infantry in Great Coats & Forage Caps (USA)
http://www.ghqmodels.com/store/acw66.html
Thank you for looking,
GHQ
April 2011 New Releases Are Posted
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:50 am
- Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
-
- E5
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:36 am
Jagdpanzer E-50
Thank you for producing this excellent model. It will compliment my Werhmacht 47 forces nicely. I presume it carries the 128/55 as on the JagdTiger. One advantage over the latter is that the silhouette on the PanzerJager E-50 is it's much lower.


Afrika Korps heia safari
-
- E5
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am
- Location: Waukegan, Illinois USA
From what I can see in the photograph of GHQ's g559, I don't think the Jagdpanzer E-50 carries the 12.8cm/L55 gun as on the JagdTiger. The 12.8cm/L55 had a smooth barrel with no step while the gun barrels in the photograph seems to have a definite step about half-way to the muzzle. I would suggest a 10cm or 10.5cm KwK. In fact, this looks a lot like the gun mounted on GHQ's g539 , E-75.
Although a significant improvement on the JagdTiger in terms of height, I would have preferred for GHQ to model the proposed version with the engine in front and the fighting compartment in back. The length of the gun barrel sticking out the front of the vehicle as modeled would have imposed uncomfortable limitations on maneuverability.
Of course, this is all hypothetical anyway, so assume whatever gun you like.
Don S.
Although a significant improvement on the JagdTiger in terms of height, I would have preferred for GHQ to model the proposed version with the engine in front and the fighting compartment in back. The length of the gun barrel sticking out the front of the vehicle as modeled would have imposed uncomfortable limitations on maneuverability.
Of course, this is all hypothetical anyway, so assume whatever gun you like.
Don S.
-
- E5
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:36 am
Yes, I can definitely see the step in the barrel...
......so a smaller caliber than the 128/55 might have been mounted. In looking at the barrel, on the other hand, it appears to be a heavy piece of ordinance, perhaps bigger than the 105 or 100 mm gun.
As you say, since these are never built armored projects, I can choose whatever gun I like.
I may vary it with the type of foe faced in combat.

As you say, since these are never built armored projects, I can choose whatever gun I like.
I may vary it with the type of foe faced in combat.


Afrika Korps heia safari
-
- E5
- Posts: 667
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:33 pm
- Location: Buford, GA
- Contact:
Great Coats!
I ordered 10 packs of the Federal Infantry advancing in great coats; for starters. I will be using them for my huge Chattanooga Campaign game at Historicon 2011.
"I was worse scared than I was at Shiloh" - Sam Watkins
Perryville, KY - October 8, 1862
Perryville, KY - October 8, 1862