1/300th & 1/285th Compatability

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

Post Reply
jeffb
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: Skem, Outer Pie Land or Right side of the Pennines, Lancs

1/300th & 1/285th Compatability

Post by jeffb »

Hi ya guys,

Have just ordered some GHQ African Brushfire Warriors. Just wondering is there a noticble difference between H&R in size. Thinking of a Skirmish between H&R Royal Marines and Brushfire warriors in a hypothetical battle.

Many Thanks

Jeff

Mk 1
E5
Posts: 2383
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA

Re: 1/300th & 1/285th Compatability

Post by Mk 1 »

jeffb wrote: Just wondering is there a noticble difference between H&R in size.
Hi ya Jeff Image

You will probably find that the GHQ figures are a bit larger (taller). You will also find that they are significantly better in detail and casting quality.

If you are modelling dioramas that will be inspected under powerful zoom lenses you will notice a significant difference. But if you are gaming ... well I mix GHQ and "Brand X" infantry fairly frequently. On the game board. Within a unit. Even on the same stand. Never had a gamer turn away my units for it.

Image
This is a picture of some of my WW2 Italians. The Combat Command came with 2 47mm AT guns, but no gun crews. So my gun crews (the kneeling figures) are "Brand X" WW2 Soviet gun crewmen. All other figures, and the guns themselves, are GHQ. Except for the LMG gunner's No2. See below.

Image
In this picture the great majority of the force is GHQ. But between a Combat Command and a pack of individual infantry, I didn't get enough LMGs for a 1-to-1 unit scale company. So some of the LMGs (the ones which lack the detail of the ammo visibly sticking out the right side) are actually WW2 Italian "Brand X" LMGs. Also there were no gunner's No2s in the GHQ infantry. So the gunner's No2s mated to the GHQ LMGs are Modern Soviet "Brand Y" Sagger gunners (who are notably thinner and smaller, and hold nothing in their hands), and the No2s mated to the "Brand X" LMGs are WW2 French "Brand Z" prone riflemen (who are actually larger and more "chunky" relative to the GHQ infantry, but you might notice them more for their greatcoats -- and for me more importantly it looks like they are holding something, which could be interpreted as an ammo strip, up to the LMGs).

I wanted an all GHQ unit, but didn't get all the figures and poses that I needed in the GHQ packs. These were what I had in the extra's bin that were close enough when I was finishing up the unit.

Can you tell? If you get close enough, you can. Does it stop me from enjoying a game? Not a chance.

Just my views. Your mileage may vary.

On edit: Names have been changed to protect the innocent.
Last edited by Mk 1 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-Mark 1
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD

jeffb
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 6:34 pm
Location: Skem, Outer Pie Land or Right side of the Pennines, Lancs

Post by jeffb »

Hi ya MK1 :D

Thanks for the info, i personally can't see any difference, but then again i'm blind as a bat.
Just need GHQ to produce Modern British inf in berets, then i'll be happy.
Still will use H&R Royal Marines Vs GHQ African militia.

Jeff

bejart7092
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:44 am
Location: Sunny Florida
Contact:

Post by bejart7092 »

I mix GHQ, and Heroics and Ros/Navwar on the same platoon stand. Here's a close up of some Brits. The front rank are both GHQ. The back two are H&R.

Image

Bill
http://www.freewebs.com/gupiao/

Post Reply