Modern Microarmour Wish List 2009-2010

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

Post Reply
Pippo
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:19 am

Post by Pippo »

I prefer to stick to subjectsused in wars. These are my proposals:

1. Generic infantry 50's to '80's infantry with SLR/FN FAL/H&K G3
2. African militia/insurgents
3. IDF Nagmasho’t, Nagmashon and Nakpadon
4. SADF Buffel and Ratel
5. Modern Middle East insurgents
6. IDF Zelda w/ Toga armour
7. Modern special forces/mercenaries
8. Modern German and French infantry and heavy weapons
9. IDF infantry w/ Galil Assault rifle

Rutgervanm
E5
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Nederland

Post by Rutgervanm »

List Upgraded, See December 17th post
Last edited by Rutgervanm on Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:49 am, edited 3 times in total.

javelin98
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 1:33 am
Location: Spokane, WA, USA

Post by javelin98 »

Many great suggestions! May I add a couple:

Iraqi T-55 Enigma:
Image

US Grizzly combat engineer vehicle
US M113A3 without the applique armor
RoK K200 APC
And all the South African stuff already mentioned!

pmskaar
E5
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 5:45 am

Modern Wish List

Post by pmskaar »

Hi Rutgervanm

Thanks for updating the list. It is nice for me to see that there are others out there that are looking for more Arab-Israeli stuff and early modern as well. I do think there are a bunch of gaps to fill in for the 1967 and 1973 wars. I have two suggestions. One is that for Soviet equipment, you sometimes list these as USSR and some items are listed as Soviet. I would suggest using one or the other and keeping them all together in one spot on the list. The other is that you have the number of requests already posted, so doing another number next to the to the specific vehicle or item is redundant and not needed. I appreciate your efforts here and thanks for posting the list.

Pete - Binpicker, Out!

Rutgervanm
E5
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Nederland

Post by Rutgervanm »

Hehe, you are totally right of course. I hadn't even noticed the double Soviet entries. I must admit it was very late when I came back from the pub and posted this. :roll: :wink:

Anyway, it has been changed and the new suggestions added.

Cheers!

Panzerleader71
E5
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 12:16 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Panzerleader71 »

"9. IDF infantry w/ Galil Assault rifle"

Not to nit-pick, but how does one tell the difference between US Infantry with M-16s (generic GHQ infantry stock) from Israeli infantry with Galils at 6mm?

Ritter
E5
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:59 am
Location: BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by Ritter »

Why, with 3.75 magnifiers of course :D

rct75001
E5
Posts: 165
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 5:47 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by rct75001 »

French, German helicopter Eurocopter Tiger
Australian armoured vehicle Bushmaster IMV
French, German helicopter Eurocopter Tiger

thanks

Pippo
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 9:19 am

Post by Pippo »

"but how does one tell the difference between US Infantry with M-16s (generic GHQ infantry stock) from Israeli infantry with Galils at 6mm?"

Hey, I CAN TELL!!! :D

Now, seriously, that depends on how keen you are on detail. I am, but I'm sure others are not. It's like saying that these US Infantry with M-16s are in fact German soldiers armed w/ G-36...

javelin98
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 1:33 am
Location: Spokane, WA, USA

Post by javelin98 »

Panzerleader71 wrote:"9. IDF infantry w/ Galil Assault rifle"

Not to nit-pick, but how does one tell the difference between US Infantry with M-16s (generic GHQ infantry stock) from Israeli infantry with Galils at 6mm?
What, can't you see the serial numbers on the side of the upper receiver? Right there, plain as day!

jb
E5
Posts: 2160
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 am
Location: Antananarivo

Post by jb »

This the trouble that GHQ's got itself into with their outstanding detail. We NOW NEED the right weapons and updated gear on our infantry...
I personally can not slap just any color on them and call them "that", so GHQ 'scuse a me for *itch'n, it needs to be said :D
John

Barklay1810
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:55 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

AH-1G, A-4, F-105, O-2, Yak, US D7G Bulldozer, Tiger, IMV

Post by Barklay1810 »

Given I have virtually every other figure in the Vietnam range, I would like to see the AH-1G made. They were flying in arguably the most combat any helicopter type had seen, any version of AH-1 had seen for a decade (almost), and yet this is not made by GHQ. And its not like its a difficult figure to make, or sell. It has smoother lines and less detail than the Q version, and anyone who games Vietnam, and wants to see a non-TOW equipped pink team would need at least two. That is a sale of several hundred figures straight off as far as I can see.

A-4 Skyhawk was another mainstay of the Navy in Vietnam, and was used extensively.It is a relatively small and uncomplicated model, and can be sold in packs of two. And there is a potential for a relatively painless upgrade of the early version by adding the A-4F "hump" without the need to make a new master.

A Vietnam range without a F-105 Thunderchief, the "Thud"? I'd like to see the single-seater and the two-seat F-105F and F-105G Wild Weasel variants (first of Wild Weasels).

O-2 Skymaster "The Duck", replaced the O-1from 1967, and were the standard US Army observation aircraft the replaced the O-1 Bird Dog (thank you).

None of these are complicated masters to make, and there is a wide number of gamers who would use them, with Skyhawks serving to the end of the Cold War, and Skymasters nearly so. The Thud is just a classic Vietnam War US aircraft.

However, I would be happy with the correct Cobra, G.

I'd also like to put a word in for the Red Air Force. The addition of I-153 and the I-16 are commendable, but these were not the aircraft that served for much of the war against German fighters (available). Currently only LaGG-3 is available in 1:285.

Petlyakov Po-2 would be nice as it was used in the light bomber and reconnaissance roles, and Yak-1,3,7,9 1940—1945 (34,000 made, half in Yak-9s) would also be nice. Only 2,748 Yak-9Ts were manufactured during the war.

As for ground vehicles, I would like to see a US D7G Bulldozer as a generic vehicle for engineering-themed scenarios (I have a modified Soviet tractor for USSR).

French, German helicopter Eurocopter Tiger (yes, another helicopter) will probably be a god idea since it is going to be used by quite a few countries.

The Australian Bushmaster IMV is one of the few non-US armoured vehicles in use in Iraq and Afghanistan, and will be used elsewhere I'm sure because Australians tend to deploy to all sorts of UN and multinational operations.

Rutgervanm
E5
Posts: 132
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Nederland

Post by Rutgervanm »

Barklay, thanks for an excellent reply.

I always get confused with Cobra types, so help me out here. The AH-1G is the standard Vietnam-era Cobra right? Basically looks like the AH-1Q allready produced by GHQ, but armed with rocket pods and miniguns and without the sensors on the nose.

The AH-1F/S allready requested in the list, should be a later type with the characteristic rectangular cockpitwindows. It should be the type that's in use with the Israeli's and the US in Mogadishu in '93. Is the 1F/S the correct type for this?

Concerning the Thunderchief, I was under the impression that the aircraft only flew strategic missions in the North and that is was rarely used for close support, thus limiting it's use for a tactical wargames table in the South?

I'll update in another week or so, so keep the suggestions coming please!

Barklay1810
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:55 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

AH-1G and the Thud

Post by Barklay1810 »

The original Cobra had the cone nose and no sensor. The TOW armed Cobara was tested in Vietnam in the last months of the US participation, but in absence of targets, were withdrawn. The armoured panels for the cockpit were introduced after the war based on the experience of the flight crews, and that is when they became angular and flat. The armament of a Cobra was very varied, but usually it was rockets (2.75"), and of course its minigun under the nose, though some used grenade launchers. The USMC was the one to first install the three-barrel gatling that is used now, but the cavalry and artillery did ok with the miniguns also.

Yes, F-105s were used primarily for strike missions in the north. I was hoping to game some missions like that given the Mig-21 is also proposed. A-4s would be really great because they flew lots of tac missions.

Barklay1810
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 4:55 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

MRAPs

Post by Barklay1810 »

Surprised these have not been requested

On Dec. 31, USTRANSCOM made good on the promise of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to have 1,500 MRAPs in theater by the end of 2007. On April 5, the command reached another major milestone of 5,000 MRAP vehicles delivered to U.S. Central Command.

Vosburg said that in the past six months, USTRANSCOM orchestrated the delivery of an additional 5,000 vehicles into the hands of warfighters.

"We are on track to exceed the 10,000 vehicle delivery mark, with the additional delivery of almost 600 more vehicles through Oct. 9," he said.

10,000 units is right up there with a widely used military vehicle

Post Reply