M-ATV, Replacement for the HUMMV?
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:01 pm
- Contact:
Not yet, although I had a nosey around one at an armoured vehicles conference recently and they are a formidable piece of kit. Certainly the star of the show.
The demo videos they showed depicted the vehicle taking on terrain that looked impossible for something that size. Apparently it has quite sophisticated traction control and suspension system that facilitates it.
The demo videos they showed depicted the vehicle taking on terrain that looked impossible for something that size. Apparently it has quite sophisticated traction control and suspension system that facilitates it.
Cave Ab Homine Unius Libri
-
- E5
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:55 am
- Location: France
-
- E5
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:01 pm
- Contact:
-
- E5
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 am
- Location: Antananarivo
The model is most definitely "over-sized"; at least it is to scale with the infantry. . .*See following pictures of the life-size one . I stand correctedkampfgruppe wrote:Hello JB
This vehicle seems very huge but i don't known if the GHQ miniatures is too high (more than the M1 ?):
Last edited by jb on Sun Jun 12, 2011 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
John
-
- E5
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:55 am
- Location: France
-
- E5
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:01 pm
- Contact:
-
- E5
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 am
- Location: Antananarivo
Upon viewing this photo I stand corrected. Looking at them and the pictures I took of them on the train they do not appear as large as when next to the people standing next to them . . .Quartette wrote:iPhone pic to give an idea of scale from the arms fair I attended earlier this year:
Not sure on GHQ's scale as I don't have the m-atv model, but as you can see from the comparative size of the people standing next to it, these things are pretty large.

Thanks for the true update.
John
-
- E5
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 2:55 am
- Location: France
-
- E5
- Posts: 1637
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Newport, RI
- Contact:
Now lets put some of their "6mm" infantry next to the beast.
Paul
Paul
“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.â€
― George Orwell, 1984
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
- George Orwell
http://av8rmongo.wordpress.com
― George Orwell, 1984
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
- George Orwell
http://av8rmongo.wordpress.com
-
- E5
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:33 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
If your refering to the TAPV, I really hope they go with the RG-35. That thing looks BAD ** CENSORED **!shawno wrote:Can anyone tell me if there's an easy way to slot an RWS from a Stryker or similar vehicle into the turret ring of the M-ATV from GHQ?
Word on the street is Canada might be getting them with the RWS instead of the manned turret, so I was wondering how easy a conversion would be.
Thanks
"...But now, seeing that the spirits of death stand close about us in their thousands, no man can turn aside or escape them, let us go on and win glory for ourselves, or yield it to others."
The Iliad
The Iliad
-
- E5
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:57 am
Yes. TAPV.Maple-leaf-Warrior wrote:If your refering to the TAPV, I really hope they go with the RG-35. That thing looks BAD ** CENSORED **!shawno wrote:Can anyone tell me if there's an easy way to slot an RWS from a Stryker or similar vehicle into the turret ring of the M-ATV from GHQ?
Word on the street is Canada might be getting them with the RWS instead of the manned turret, so I was wondering how easy a conversion would be.
Thanks
RG35 RPU looks interesting but it might make more sense to get the MATV from a logistical stand point. I have a feeling they might get an M-ATV with an RWS and then use the rear deck to house an updated surv suite. Just my wild guess, unless they are going to re work the organizations of units once again.
So anyone think I can slot an RWS from a stryker on an M-ATV then? Any other turret options that might easily work for the vehicle?
Here's an example of a MARSOC vehicle
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/29/418931.jpg