Micronaut Only Thread

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

Post Reply
exodusforever
E5
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:21 am
Location: Singapore

Post by exodusforever »

Its been quite a while since the Micronauts Thread has been updated so I figure I 'd showcase my completed Nimitz Aircraft Carrier with the rest of my ships.

Took me quite awhile but I finally completed my Carrier Battle Group for my fictitious Modern Day US Navy. Hope you enjoy.

Image

Image
Carrier sailing in the sunset.

Image
The Carrier and its escorts. The Pennant number 7 was intended as it is for my own fictitious navy. Not to be representative of any of the actual Nimitz Carriers.

Image

Image

Image

Cheers and Happy Thanksgiving and Black Friday to all!
Last edited by exodusforever on Tue Nov 29, 2011 1:36 am, edited 2 times in total.
IG: modernwargame
"The best weapon against an enemy is another enemy."
-Friedrich Nietzsche

Mickel
E5
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Mickel »

They were too big. The Treaty limited heavy cruisers to 10,000 tons. When all was said and done with their refits, the Takaos were over 13,000. This game them a LOT more room for engines and extensive compartmentalization that made them fast and survivable in battle.
I was under the impression they were ~10,000 tons as built as per the terms of the Washington Treaty, and not re-built until about 1940. The Washington Treaty was only in force until the 31st of December 1936 (Article XXIII). Japan (among other nations) was not a signatory of the 1936 London Treaty. They were only around 30' longer than contemporary British heavy cruisers, and ~10' narrower. The advantage they had is they didn't require the range of a British cruiser, so they carried a lot less oil (not included in the standard displacement in any case, but the required structure to hold it was), and the habitability requirements were less than those of British or US cruisers, so had weight and volume freed up for other uses.

Mike

Mickel
E5
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Post by Mickel »

1st CS, Royal Navy, 1914:
Image
Close up of Minotaur (left) and Duke Of Edinburgh (right), GHQ's two latest WWI RN offerings:
Image
Now I need a slightly less gusty day outside to paint them white.

Mike

sam scott
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:58 am

Post by sam scott »

Looking forward to seeing those with paint, Mike.

foxbat
E5
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:01 am
Location: France

Post by foxbat »

exodus forever, these are some really sweet looking ships you've got here! 8)

My turn now, a few WW
italian ships :
Vittorio Veneto
Image

Image

Image

Andrea Doria
Image

Image

Image

Garibaldi
Image

Image

Image

Duca d'Aoste
Image

Image

Image

Gorizia
Image

Image

Image

Soldati DDs
Image

Image

sam scott
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:58 am

Post by sam scott »

Say what you want about their historical performance, the Italian navy makes for a great looking fleet! Nicely done

battlewagon
E5
Posts: 231
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:57 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Post by battlewagon »

Foxbat: Very nice fleet you have there. What did you use for the bases on the ships?
Always respect the law of gross tonnage (aka "bigger boat wins")

exodusforever
E5
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:21 am
Location: Singapore

Post by exodusforever »

Thanks foxbat for the compliments.

Really Great Make on the Italian Navy.

Love the Paintjob and the basing.

Really ingenious way of doing the bases.
IG: modernwargame
"The best weapon against an enemy is another enemy."
-Friedrich Nietzsche

foxbat
E5
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:01 am
Location: France

Post by foxbat »

Thanks, the wavy bases have been bought from Old Dominion Games Workshop. They certainly look really good.

BlackLegion
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:01 pm

Post by BlackLegion »

My first post and my first Micronauts ships for the Imperial Japanese Navy. :)

Myōkō Class Heavy Cruiser Myōkō:
Image
Image

Yūgumo Class Destroyers Makinami, Naganami and Takanami:
Image
Image

My whole fleet so far:
Image

Now i have to find a substitute for Kagerō Class Destroyers.

Mk 1
E5
Posts: 2383
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
Location: Silicon Valley, CA

Post by Mk 1 »

BlackLegion wrote:My first post and my first Micronauts ships for the Imperial Japanese Navy. :)
Wow. Great stuff! Welcome BL, and thanks for the photos. Very inspiring. :P

I love the detailing ... the way the guns and turrets are painted, the scout planes ... just great.

Also I very much like the basing. Particularly how much wave action is represented. Those ships are on the high seas, not just cruising across some placid lake somewhere!

Truly inspiring. Looking forward to seeing more. :wink:
-Mark 1
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD

fullmetaljacket
E5
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Warsaw, Indiana

Post by fullmetaljacket »

Foxbat and Blacklegion nice work both of you, amazing painting and basing.

Foxbat i could not find the bases you said you used, if you would please post a link or mre information where to go too. It would be greatly appreciated, also what did you use for you name tags, Ie. paper, font and size?

fullmetaljacket

foxbat
E5
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:01 am
Location: France

Post by foxbat »

Blacklegion, that's a nice Japanese squadron you've got here. I especially like the work on your bases. Very lively! 8)

sam scott
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:58 am

Post by sam scott »

BL, I like those loads, especially the ships themselves!

You can try to use the Asashio-class as a sub for Kageros. They are very similar in layout and appearance.

Are you building for any particular rules-set or scenario?

pmskaar
E5
Posts: 2205
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 5:45 am

Micronaut Only

Post by pmskaar »

If my memory serves me correctly, the Yagumo which GHQ makes is probably the closest in look to the Kagero. I remember it being essentially, an improved Kagero and being roughly the same size but about 6 feet longer. An interesting bit of trivia here - GHQ used to market the Yagumo as the Kagero. This was about 20 years ago. I know this because I bought some at that time.

Pete - Binpicker, Out!

Post Reply