Customer Gallery?

This is a general forum for all types of posts related to Military models.

Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1

Hagen
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 6:10 am
Location: Wisconsin

Post by Hagen »

piersyf wrote:The stuff shown all qualifies so far, and is good quality stuff, but to stay 'true' to the intent of the thread, just post what it is and its product number, or it really belongs in the 'show us your stuff' thread. Not wanting to be a Nazi on this, just think we should keep to the intent of the thread...
Edited my post to reflect the spirit of the thread! :)
Even the mightiest oak started out as a little nut that held it's ground.

av8rmongo
E5
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Newport, RI
Contact:

Post by av8rmongo »

piersyf wrote:Don't want to dampen any enthusiasm here, but the difference between this thread and the 'show us your stuff' thread is to describe GHQ specific products and show them in a painted form (like the catalogue, except for the new releases). If you read the first entry, this thread was created in response to GHQ showing new releases as castings until a painted version was available for display. The 'determined' criteria for this thread is that it is an unmodified GHQ model, painted, and indicates the product number, which you can probably pick up if you follow the entries until November. The stuff shown all qualifies so far, and is good quality stuff, but to stay 'true' to the intent of the thread, just post what it is and its product number, or it really belongs in the 'show us your stuff' thread. Not wanting to be a Nazi on this, just think we should keep to the intent of the thread...
(Note: willing to be challenged on my assertions 'cause this aint my thread, but to my mind this is the ONLY difference from 'show us yer stuff). Also, I'm not trying to get you to move your entries to the other thread; the recent entries have kept the thread alive and are showing GHQ models as WE paint them so I think this is a good thread to maintain. Just suggesting that in future you say what the model is and maybe the product number (you may notice some of mine are no longer in production, so they are legacy products).
Let us also standardize the size of the photos submitted. If they're too large it causes problems for some readers. busboy, love your stuff but can you make the pictures a wee bit smaller? Not sure what the standard is or should be but most picture hosting website have recommended settings for discussion groups.
“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.â€￾
― George Orwell, 1984

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
- George Orwell

http://av8rmongo.wordpress.com

busboy
E5
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:18 am

Post by busboy »

av8rmongo wrote:
piersyf wrote:Don't want to dampen any enthusiasm here, but the difference between this thread and the 'show us your stuff' thread is to describe GHQ specific products and show them in a painted form (like the catalogue, except for the new releases). If you read the first entry, this thread was created in response to GHQ showing new releases as castings until a painted version was available for display. The 'determined' criteria for this thread is that it is an unmodified GHQ model, painted, and indicates the product number, which you can probably pick up if you follow the entries until November. The stuff shown all qualifies so far, and is good quality stuff, but to stay 'true' to the intent of the thread, just post what it is and its product number, or it really belongs in the 'show us your stuff' thread. Not wanting to be a Nazi on this, just think we should keep to the intent of the thread...
(Note: willing to be challenged on my assertions 'cause this aint my thread, but to my mind this is the ONLY difference from 'show us yer stuff). Also, I'm not trying to get you to move your entries to the other thread; the recent entries have kept the thread alive and are showing GHQ models as WE paint them so I think this is a good thread to maintain. Just suggesting that in future you say what the model is and maybe the product number (you may notice some of mine are no longer in production, so they are legacy products).
Let us also standardize the size of the photos submitted. If they're too large it causes problems for some readers. busboy, love your stuff but can you make the pictures a wee bit smaller? Not sure what the standard is or should be but most picture hosting website have recommended settings for discussion groups.
It took me a while to reply, but I've reduced the image size. They're still probably too big, but at least it shouldn't be killing slower internet connections or be too big for the browser windows any more.
-busboy

General Retreat
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:02 am
Location: North of Dayton, Ohio

Churchill Bridge Layer - Question about pack

Post by General Retreat »

Beautiful work. Question about the Churchill Bridge layer (UK85): Is the Bridge removable (to lay across a river) or are separate bridges included in the pack?

John Secker
E5
Posts: 204
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:19 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Post by John Secker »

No extra bridges, but you can easily build the vehicles with the bridges unattached, and remove them to show when and where they have been deployed - I did exactly that in a recent battle.

General Retreat
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 6:02 am
Location: North of Dayton, Ohio

Sufficient

Post by General Retreat »

Thanks. That's good enough. Not sure which bridge layers I'll get.

StarCruiser
E5
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:42 am
Location: Houston, we have a problem...

Post by StarCruiser »

Image

(Sorry, I just had to...)
"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of java that the thoughts acquire speed. The hands acquire the shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion." - Programmer's Mantra

nashorn88
E5
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:15 am

my best work

Post by nashorn88 »

I don't think I can paint much better then this.

Image
Image
Image

paul
E5
Posts: 570
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 9:06 am
Location: Orlando Area

Post by paul »

That looks really good to me.

John Secker
E5
Posts: 204
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:19 am
Location: Warrington, UK

Post by John Secker »

We're getting the authentic "Typhoon's eye view" :)

RedLeif
E5
Posts: 784
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:11 am
Location: Boise, ID
Contact:

Post by RedLeif »

Most awesome detailing Nashorn.

nashorn88
E5
Posts: 614
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:15 am

Tiger I

Post by nashorn88 »

Image
Image

ZAJACMWZ
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:42 am

Russian WW2

Post by ZAJACMWZ »

R10 SU-100 and a pair of R5 IS-2

Image

Matt

ZAJACMWZ
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:42 am

German WW2

Post by ZAJACMWZ »

G99 SdKfz 251C/1 and G121 - sIG Pz IB

Image

Matt

Post Reply