Gompel wrote:I am always interested in trees and landscape in general, but where did you get that list from? It seems off to me.
I count in centimeters and meters, but if I convert your inches, those tree sizes seem to be what a tree can max. become under maybe perfect conditions. I mean, where I live (NL), trees are not often taller than 20m (roughly 30feet that is). Most adult trees are about 15m I think. 15meter = 1500cm -> 1:285 scale makes 5,3cm. That is just over 2 inch.
So maybe trees are taller in your area, but I wouldn't go as far as saying 'trees commonly range in heights up to 300 feet'. I think I can savely say that trees in Europe are commonly not taller than 30m (roughly 100feet that is).
What battlefields are you scaling?
Perhaps the "new math" has reached NL?

I think 20 meters is about 65 feet, not 30!
Being a long time model railroader, the size of trees and such is something I pay a lot of attention to.
Without looking at too many numbers, I would say Marks' list is pretty accurate for mature "old growth" trees. Such trees were once common in parts of the US.
But in Europe, I think you cut down your old-growth forests a long time ago; too much ship building maybe?

Perhaps on parts of the russian front you might find them?
I know that my own home state of Pennsylvania exported huge amounts of big timber to Europe in the 19th.century for exactly that reason.
From an American perspective, while most of our big trees may have been cut by WW2 era, some did remain-mostly on the west coast, but not all.
In Pennsylvania, we were lucky enough to protect some of the last groves, and there are still white pine and hemlock in them that reach from 45 to over 60 meters in height.
So, a maximum of 280 or more feet...
OTOH, from a gaming standpoint I've never used many trees over about 4-5 inches; even in larger (15/20mm)scales- and only that big if on movable bases or singly.
Like others, I've mostly used around 2"/50mm in "Micro" It's practical, and to me it looks right.