U. I. N. United Imagi-Nations.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Wed Dec 05, 2018 12:35 am

Now that the US has taken control of the GPRC brgade, the GS will hand the prisoners we said we executed over to the UIN. They were retained for live evidence. We would never bury them "on location" in any case. Of course, that raises the question of who the bodies were that GPRC said it dug up along OUR BORDER, ONE THOUSAND MILES INTO US TERRITORY. I'm sure the UIN will be interested in investigating THAT. GS notes that CofC and UIN only became interested in this incident once it went south, by the way...

chrisswim · Post by **chrisswim** » Wed Dec 05, 2018 12:55 am

So GS is the terrorist state, the ruthless state having the US as a puppet. Getting other to do your dirty work. Ummmmmm.
Interesting to be sure how you operate. Make others serve as you puppet. Have nukes to force the US to serve you as you wish.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:24 am

Well, let's review the bidding. CofC, in collusion with GPRC, set a combat brigade on the GS border, attempting to disguise its intentions by using a fictitious name for GS. Realizing the threat, implied or otherwise, the GS took steps WITHIN ITS BORDER, to defend itself, while observing that GPRC had already committed the violation of US sovereignty, which risk would only have been taken if it had clear intentions of causing GS harm. GPRC inserted "little green men" into GS, an act of war. GS contacted its big brother, US, informing them of foreign combat forces on their soil. US reached the conclusion this was undesirable in any case, and moved foeces to remove the foreign troops, coordinating with GS with an understanding that combat might ensue with either GS or US forces by the INVADER. US understood that GS was quite capable of defeating GPRC forces on its own, but GS and US wished to avoid bloidshed. Steps were taken to isolate GPRC forces and remove them from US soil and proximity to GS, thus avoiding combat and the threat, depending on GPRC conduct. Resolution: No more threat, no bloodshed.

Care to try again?

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Wed Dec 05, 2018 1:48 am

And while we are at it, who sent GPRC off violating one sovereign state with intent to invade another? Shall we bring up the matter of those bodies GPRC presented they supposedly dug up on our border after we told them we executed their LGM? WE don't bury those we execute on location because we take them for court martial to establish their status, first. In this case, we just locked em up until this whole matter was resolved. Now, where did GPRC "dig up" those bodies, because WE didn't shoot anybody?

Sure, let's call GS, who found a way to AVOID bloodshed AND invasion, staying within its borders, the "terrorist," Sun Tzu.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Thu Dec 06, 2018 9:45 pm

GS observes there has still been no move by UIN to sanction GPRC for its aggressive actions against U.S. and GS. This we me to confirm G'S allegations that UIN is an instrument of Cof C and Cof C colluded with GPRC in its aggression against two peaceful states. GS will certainly keep this in mind in dealing with those parties.

chrisswim · Post by **chrisswim** » Thu Dec 06, 2018 11:50 pm

panzergator wrote:GS observes there has still been no move by UIN to sanction GPRC for its aggressive actions against U.S. and GS. This we me to confirm G'S allegations that UIN is an instrument of Cof C and Cof C colluded with GPRC in its aggression against two peaceful states. GS will certainly keep this in mind in dealing with those parties.

We think that you placed sanctions on GPRC.
Second, what is your real evidence of the UIN being an instrument of CoC?
The UIN existed before CoC became a member.
Third, I do hope you will keep this in mind, as you should actually engage your mind.
Is it cold in Kansas?

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Fri Dec 07, 2018 4:50 am

The GS has no authority to place sanctions on GPRC, since it is not a member of UIN. One would have thought, however, the CofUIN would have done so on its own initiative, if GPRC is a member and had broken its covenant by invading one neighbor and planning aggression against another, regardless of the status of either of the "victim" nations. But that's ok. You all just go about your business, acquiring nations, taxing them for your own benefit, building your hegemony. Just leave GS alone. It has not threatened any imagination, whether a dom or not. GS will, however, continue to express its opinion regarding Cof C actions, whether you like it or not. Some Democrat YOU are, plotting to take over GS because you don't like what it says about you.

chrisswim · Post by **chrisswim** » Sat Dec 08, 2018 8:00 pm

GS acts like a member or it has a hegemonist approach to the UIN and many of the countries and certainly the Commonwealth.
. GS could place its own sanctions on PROC.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:10 pm

Clearly, someone doesn't know what a hegemony is, or he would not accuse GS of being one. Just what effect would sanctions by GS have on ANY country, as small as we are.

GS was merely pointing to the "principles" supposedly advanced by the UIN, as well as CofC, in the recent unprovoked aggression against the U.S. and GS. There has been no evidence of admonishment or punishment of GPRC for its dastardly behavior, clearly indicating collusion among the three agents, GPRC, UIN, and CofC, to harm GS. GS points this out to other states for their consideration when CofC trumpets its drivel about good intentions and betterment of humanity. It's principles CLEARLY do not apply if CofC will not profit from actions.

Guroburov · Post by **Guroburov** » Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:00 am

The glorious nation of PROG does not wish to get drawn into this feud between CofC and GS, despite the CofC suggesting GS should place sanctions on us. Our sympathies lie with the oft maligned Gator State.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:37 am

GS isn't likely to go along with much of what CoC does or says, Mr. G. GS considers CofC to be a meddler at best in world affairs who could use a healthy dose of MYOB. And I find myself in agreement and sympathy with PROG. I used to think I could say the same for GPRC, but some undesirable appears to have taken over there. Appears more to be a puppet of CofC, like so many others. An entity the size of GS isn't likely to be able to enforce any sanctions against anyone, given that GS possesses no air or naval assets (I'm too cheap - I spend my money on Army ground assets - tanks, APCs, IFVs, Arty, Engineers, Signal, ADA.) Only states such as CofC, which steal assets from the states they have absorbed, can afford extensive navies and air forces. The members of CofC are taxed and drafted to provide its ability to interfere in the affairs of peaceful states.

chrisswim · Post by **chrisswim** » Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:24 am

From North Korean Radio
"A submarine from our glorious naval forces extracted revenge upon Canada. Canada would not grant asylum to SSN Romeo 9 when they were boxed in the treacherous capitalist Commonwealth of Chrisdom. Since Romeo 9 was forced out of the waters, it was captured by the evil Commonwealth, led by the nefarious ugly guy. They have not released our crew members. They have not released our submarine either in violations of international law. They need to do that now, do not delay."
. "Canada had an offensive ship with high performance aircraft made by the evil US that Canada uses. The CF-14 and the CF-18. That ship was not able to escape our submarine. It was sunk hour or so ago. The bad Canadians also had destroyers and planes flying in the area attacking our submarine. It defended itself, The Captain of the sub, his brother is one Romeo 9, so is a prisoner of the mid-evil Commonwealth."
. "Besides, the sinking Commonwealth is next to that pig loving Sheik of your bouti. It is a sick world out there. that is why we need to defend ourselves.
. Ask the UIN to help release our crewmen and our submarine immediately. We demand reparations for the loss of our two submarines in Canadian waters for the loss of two submarines and the crewmen and families. $5 billion US dollars is the right amount to punish Canada and punish the US and punish the Commonwealth."

7.62 · Post by **7.62** » Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:25 am

The government of Yer Bouti urges the UIN to condemn in the strongest possible way last nights failed attempts to attack the air defences of YB by the CofC.
Many hostile aerial targets have been repulsed and shot down.
This baseless and unprovoked attack will not go unpunished.

The CofC diplomatic staff remain safe in their compound, YB will not enter the area and respects the international norms of the property.
They are free to leave as soon as it is safe for them to do so, maybe with the help of a third party for oversight.

Some none diplomatic staff of the colonial rogue state have been detained regarding acts of sabotage, the independent YB courts will act on that matter.

The Yer Bouti government also commends the UC's Mech on its proud stance against the CofCs meddling in World affairs.

panzergator · Post by **panzergator** » Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:53 am

Tell the North Koreans to go to hell. Their subs wouldn't be sunk if they weren't playing outside their own sandbox.

Guroburov · Post by **Guroburov** » Thu Dec 13, 2018 9:45 am

The CofC forces have launched an unprovoked attack upon another nation. One of their submarines launched numerous missiles at a naval base in North Korea and attempted to effect a regime change by targeting that nations leader. North Korean submarines attacked Canadian shipping in another unprovoked attack earlier this week. Both nations should be made to be brought to heel by this body or the UIN is acknowledging its acceptance of violence for the resolution of petty agendas. We should not accept any nation taking unilateral actions against another member nation. No one is the world police--Marshall Sukurovski, PROG ambassador to the UIN.