Pop quiz
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
Forgot the "Mesa" after "de la.". Terry de la Allen. Hard riding, hard drinking, hard swearing, did I mention hard drinking?
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:12 am
Redleg nailed the teams first. While the aero weapons, aero scout and aero rifle platoons were separate entities for chain of command purposes, aircav troops would task organize based on METT-T. The smallest entity would be a team of at least two aircraft.
If no contact was anticipated, i. e., a route recon behind friendly lines typically the troop commander would launch a white team of two loaches. If contact was anticipated, i. e., an area recon of an LZ in unknown or enemy territory, then you would see a pink team of one loach and one gunship. Pure red teams were unusual unless the mission was an insertion were the gunships were there to proved fire support to the landing and scouts buzzing about would just be in the way.
You could also see a light pink team with two scouts and one gunship or a heavy pink team with one scout and two gunships. The number of teams launched on any given mission depended on METT-T.
I think PG nailed the blues question although I'm not 100% certain of the answer myself. Red leg was not wrong about how much humping a ruck through the bush sucks but I think it was because the troopers in the aero rifle platoon were infantry MOS and led by an infantry officer. There were some folks who held out that they were called the blues because it rounded out the red, white and blue thing but I don't think that is accurate.
If no contact was anticipated, i. e., a route recon behind friendly lines typically the troop commander would launch a white team of two loaches. If contact was anticipated, i. e., an area recon of an LZ in unknown or enemy territory, then you would see a pink team of one loach and one gunship. Pure red teams were unusual unless the mission was an insertion were the gunships were there to proved fire support to the landing and scouts buzzing about would just be in the way.
You could also see a light pink team with two scouts and one gunship or a heavy pink team with one scout and two gunships. The number of teams launched on any given mission depended on METT-T.
I think PG nailed the blues question although I'm not 100% certain of the answer myself. Red leg was not wrong about how much humping a ruck through the bush sucks but I think it was because the troopers in the aero rifle platoon were infantry MOS and led by an infantry officer. There were some folks who held out that they were called the blues because it rounded out the red, white and blue thing but I don't think that is accurate.
Tactics are the opinion of the senior officer present.
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am
It was a good question! I'm certa that the Blues was because they were infantry. Lots of discussion at Fort Knox about that.
All blessings flow from a good mission statement.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
Pogo was right. So was Ike.
"A Gentleman is a man who is only rude intentionally." (Churchill)
Give credit. Take responsibility.
-
- E5
- Posts: 3809
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:02 am
- Location: Riverside, CA
-
- E5
- Posts: 7270
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:22 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Yes sir Redleg. He took over training command, did well as I understand.
There several generals that were relieved of command in North Africa that served well later in Europe. Needing to determine whether training, soldiers and/or equipment I guess using a WW1 artillery piece on a halftrack calling it a tank destroyer doesn’t mean it is effective T.D.
There several generals that were relieved of command in North Africa that served well later in Europe. Needing to determine whether training, soldiers and/or equipment I guess using a WW1 artillery piece on a halftrack calling it a tank destroyer doesn’t mean it is effective T.D.
Chris
-
- E5
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 3:44 am