
Top Secret Information From GHQ
Moderators: dnichols, GHQ, Mk 1
-
- E5
- Posts: 347
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 9:30 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:03 am
- Location: Chicagoland
Crocodiles
Rats! I already scratch built my Churchill Crocodiles too! 
But at least I still have hope for the T29...

But at least I still have hope for the T29...

-
- E5
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:27 pm
- Location: Missouri
-
- E5
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:27 pm
- Location: Missouri
-
- E5
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 10:28 pm
- Location: France (Luzarches, near Chantilly)
news
Happy for those who play with aircraft fighters or those who collect them ...
But, again like 33YearGHQ has said, I'm not excited about this one : Not really essential for my WWII ground battles...

But, again like 33YearGHQ has said, I'm not excited about this one : Not really essential for my WWII ground battles...

Pibber.
(Long life to GHQ !)
(Long life to GHQ !)
-
- E5
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 3:21 am
- Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Seriously? Cama, really? You had not heard of Lavotchkin's leading design before?cama wrote:Had to google the La-5 ...
Of course you didn't actually need to go to Google ... you could have gone to our own Scratch-Build thread: http://www.ghqmodels.com/forum/viewtopi ... c&start=15
Now just about every one of the planes I scratch-built years ago has been turned into a beautiful model.
-Mark 1
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD
Difficile est, saturam non scribere.
"It is hard NOT to write satire." - Decimus Iunius Juvenalis, 1st Century AD
-
- E5
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:59 am
- Contact:
-
- E5
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 3:11 am
- Location: Boise, ID
- Contact:
-
- E5
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Somerset, UK
-
- E5
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:24 am
- Location: Waukegan, Illinois USA
I'm not doing Microarmor right now (concentrating on Micronauts for the time being), but I certainly have opinions about GHQ's releases in 1/285 scale. I think the La-5 is an excellent choice. It was an excellent aircraft, built in significant numbers, and participated in combat. There aren't many more Soviet aircraft of WWII appropriate for Microarmor scale left to model (by my opinion, Polikarpov Po-2, Tupolev SB, and Tupolev Tu-2).
My only reservation is that I would like to see GHQ start producing aircraft for France, Japanese army, and Poland.
Don S.
My only reservation is that I would like to see GHQ start producing aircraft for France, Japanese army, and Poland.
Don S.
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 8:07 am
- Location: Knoxville, TN
cama wrote:Wow, you really did a great job of that!Mk 1 wrote:Seriously? Cama, really? You had not heard of Lavotchkin's leading design before?cama wrote:Had to google the La-5 ...
Of course you didn't actually need to go to Google ... you could have gone to our own Scratch-Build thread: http://www.ghqmodels.com/forum/viewtopi ... c&start=15
Now just about every one of the planes I scratch-built years ago has been turned into a beautiful model.
Seriously though, I am not that big on Eastern Front, so didn't know about the La-5 - hard to believe, I know
Not only did I have to Google the La-5, I had to Google the Pe-2 as well. Then kicked myself as soon as I recognized it. I am HUGE into WWII Eastern Front........Ground......I still can't always tell an He-111 from a Ju-88 or a Yak from a Lagg. Dude, with WWII and Modern MicroArmour, Micronauts thru the Ages (ancients, Napoleonics, Ironclads, Great War, WWII and Modern), ACW., Ancients and Napoleonics land war I do good to tell a Tiger I and Tiger II apart at any given time. Don't even get me started on T-64/72/80/90 etc.

-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 708
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:50 am
- Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA